The best charity in-house lawyers follow through with projects from beginning to end, according to in-house legal advisor Darren Heath. The lawyer explains the main difference between being an in-house attorney and operating from a contracted, private practice stance.
“The key difference is about seeing projects to end,” Heath shares. “Being in-house gives you that ability to complete projects and monitor their progress effectively,” the lawyer shares.
“Working for a charity, specifically, gives another dimension to that,” Heath continues. “You can have a wider perspective than simply creating, or defending the profit of your organization,” the lawyer explains. “At a charity, you have to have an eye on the wider purposes of the charity.”
Seeing projects to the end is one of several qualities an accident attorney, or other legal representatives, must possess. The following are other traits to encourage when training a good legal team.
A lawyer must be capable of clearly conveying the point. Such is especially true in court or mediation. A legal advisor never wants to give his or her opponent the opportunity to use his or her words to weaken the argument. It is, therefore, imperative that an attorney remains true to the facts of the matter and clearly states his or her position.
There are times when a cause is worth pursuing until the end. Then, there are instances where bowing out gracefully is the best solution.
A legal team must know when to move on to the next issue.
Analytical and Research Skills
Going along with good judgment are excellent analytical and research skills. A part of the reason why a legal team can determine when bowing out gracefully is appropriate is because of the research and analysis that points to the potential of taking a loss on the matter. Legal professionals must, therefore, have impeccable abilities when it comes to observing and looking beyond the surface of matters.
Excellent Writing Skills
Along with excellent oral communication comes the need for great writing skills. The best legal teams succinctly convey the facts without a lot of fluff to lead up to the point.
Providing written communication free of grammatical and spelling errors is also important. A lawyer’s solid argument can become entangled in a misunderstanding when too many typographical errors are in the written response. It is not always possible for a legal advisor to orally explain his position after delivering a written response riddled in error.